A Review Focusing on Socio Economic Factors by Cherian and Jacob

a very popular topic of professional discussions. With the growing emphasis on sustainability and environmental protection, has become an object of heightened public concern.

According to Uriarte (2008), solid waste is what results from consumption (both animal and human) and what is usually discarded as unnecessary and useless. In this context, the study by Cherian and Jacob (2012) adds to the existing body of literature on solid waste management.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
A Review Focusing on Socio Economic Factors by Cherian and Jacob
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Cherian and Jacob (2012) admit that waste management is a very complex process that is impossible without sufficient information and sophisticated technologies. Numerous factors impact the quality and results of solid waste management, and the goal of Cherian and Jacob (2012) is to review them.

Statement of Research Problem
Solid waste management is impossible without information and technologies. The latter provide better knowledge of the factors impacting waste management and, at the same time, allow for more reliable waste quantity forecasts (Cherian & Jacobs, 2012).

Earlier researchers recognized the essential role played by socioeconomic factors in (Mazzanti & Zoboli, 2009).

Today, no waste disposal protocol can be established without considering the amount of waste generated (based on population density), its costs (depending on the amount of waste), and the criteria of an system that are directly related to the nature and amount of waste in a particular community (Cherian & Jacobs, 2012).

The discussed article was aimed to review the earlier models of solid waste generation and their socioeconomic identifiers (Cherian & Jacobs, 2012). The researchers expected that their findings would facilitate the development of new, more effective waste management design options.

The researchers applied to secondary research methods and used a literature review approach to accomplish their research mission. Cherian and Jacob (2012) systematically researched a number of scholarly databases, including Sage, Science Direct, and Emerald, to identify the studies that matched their search criteria.

The following key words were used: solid waste management, solid waste generation, municipal solid waste, and household waste (Cherian & Jacob, 2012).

The studies eligible for the inclusion in the research sample had to:

be focused on solid waste management;
include solid waste management models;
incorporate other independent variables like ;
be published in English (Cherian & Jacob, 2012).
Only primary data and empirical studies were included. A total of nine studies were indentified and included in the sample.

Procedural Flaws
Cherian and Jacob (2012) were quite specific in the development of their sample criteria. Still, one of the major procedural flaws is in the fact that the researchers used only a few scholarly databases; as a result, their sample of secondary data was very limited.

Another problem was that, in case of any disagreements, they were resolved either by consensus or with the help of a third reviewer (Cherian & Jacob, 2012). The consensus could have resulted in subjective bias and, again, limit the availability of valuable data to be included in the sample.

Finally, the use of secondary data is by itself a problematic endeavor. Secondary data can be very helpful in establishing and justifying a research question but cannot always serve as a reliable source of credible information (Collins, 2010).

Cherian and Jacob (2012) used a set of methodological criteria but did not evaluate the credibility of the data, before they were included in their sample. This, in turn, may impose severe limitations on the quality of the study outcomes.

Data Analysis
The following are the criteria used by Cherian and Jacob (2012) to analyze the data.

First, constituency versus households the researchers explored the competence of regional waste management planning for constituency studies and the relationship between household habits and solid waste principles for household studies (Cherian & Jacob, 2012).

Second, studies were categorized and analyzed by the type of waste streams material streams, collection streams, and other independent variables (Cherian & Jacob, 2012).

Limited and Justifiable Conclusions
Unfortunately, the conclusions made by Cherian and Jacobs (2012) are quite limited and confusing. As mentioned earlier, the basic limitation is related to the use of secondary data.

In addition, Cherian and Jacob (2012) have failed to meet the goal of their study, which was to delineate the main features of the earlier solid waste management models and to review their socioeconomic identifiers.

Instead, Cherian and Jacob (2012) propose a number of aspects to be considered in the future studies and specify the two types of case studies used to justify their findings.

The researchers recommend developing a more complex forecast model, which will incorporate the elements of location, planning, type of waste generated, and possible changes in the amount of waste per capita (Cherian & Jacob, 2012).

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with Essay Help Republic
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
See why 20k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Classic English Literature
awesome research and organization
Customer 452451, May 26th, 2022
Nice job!
Customer 452459, September 27th, 2022
Classic English Literature
Awesome Work. Highly recommend the writer
Customer 452461, November 21st, 2022
on time and very legit!
Customer 452447, May 18th, 2022
i love every detail of the paper. am sure i'll get an A+
Customer 452459, September 27th, 2022
Classic English Literature
no errors and top-notch grammar
Customer 452451, May 26th, 2022
Customer reviews in total
Current satisfaction rate
3 pages
Average paper length
Customers referred by a friend
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat
error: Content is protected !!
Open chat
Need assignment help? You can contact our live agent via WhatsApp using +1 718 717 2861

Feel free to ask questions, clarifications, or discounts available when placing an order.