Floridas citrus industry has experienced a series of devastating blows

Floridas orange harvest is the lowest since 1947 (Neate, 2016).
The decline in orange production is caused by a citrus greening diseasehuanglongbing (HLB) (Neate, 2016).
Hurricane Irma exacerbated the issue by reducing orange crops by 21 percent (Bjerga & Perez, 2017).
The entire industry is in a dire position.
Floridas citrus industry has experienced a series of devastating blows that have put it on the brink of collapse. Currently, the states orange harvest is the lowest since 1947, which can shrink the industry to less than a half of its size (Neate, 2016). According to the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), Hurricane Irma devastated the harvest, thereby reducing orange production by 21 percent (as cited in Bjerga & Perez, 2017). It is estimated that orange farmers in the State of Florida, which is the leading US producer of the fruit, will harvest only 54 million boxes in the 2017-2018 season (Neate, 2016). The plummeting crop production has several causes.

The valuable commodity, which has become an inspiration for the states beverage, flower, and song, is a mainstay of agriculture in the region. However, its production has always been associated with numerous struggles such as hurricanes, freezes, periods of frost and competition from a major exporter of orangesBrazil (Florida agriculture, 2016). However, orange producers in the state have encountered an enemy that is more dangerous than weather conditions. The hurdle that has put the entire industry in dire straits is a bacterium that causes a citrus greening disease known as huanglongbing (HLB) (Neate, 2016).

Citrus HLB originates from Asia.
The disease is characterized by patchy mottling on the plants shoots and leaves (Wang & Trivedi, 2013).
The progression of HLB is associated with crop reductions and fruit discoloration.
More than $100 million in research has been directed towards the elimination of the disease (Neate, 2016).
Citrus HLB is a crop disease that has been known in Asia for many decades (Wang & Trivedi, 2013). HLB had been largely ignored by the world community until it was transmitted to the US in 2005 (Neate, 2016; Wang & Trivedi, 2013). The disease that has suddenly become relevant now threatens the existence of the citrus industry in the country.

In terms of symptomatology, HLB is characterized by several effects all of which threaten the life of the plant. The disease produces patchy mottling on shoots and leaves. The infected areas are stunted, which causes gradual tissue deterioration that is concomitant with HLB progression. Fruits produced by affected orange trees are usually disfigured and discolored. It has to do with the fact that fruits from healthy citrus trees start developing their signature orange color at the stylar end first, whereas peduncular end remains green (Wang & Trivedi, 2013). The process is reversed on HLB-affected oranges, which often causes oranges to drop before harvest (Wang & Trivedi, 2013). The affected trees are also characterized by excessive leaf loss that results from the alteration of normal root function. The qualitative and quantitative reduction of crop yields has led to a steep price increase of orange-derived products. Therefore, orange farmers have invested more than $100 million in research to combat the progression of HLB (Neate, 2016).

HLB Symptoms
Management of HLB
HLB is transmitted by the Asian citrus psyllid (ACP).
The management of the disease falls into two categories: chemical control of ACP and chemical control of HLB (Feely, 2016).
The chemical control of the condition is associated with an ethical dilemma.
HLB is extremely hard to manage; therefore, the production of orange crops in affected areas is expensive (Feely, 2016). The disease is transmitted by the Asian citrus psyllid (ACP), which, in addition to spreading the infection, causes indirect damages to orange trees. According to Boina & Bloomquist (2015), the damages are caused by heavy ingestion of phloem sap by adults and nymphs and injection of toxins through saliva (p. 808). The psyllid is the disease vector of the HLB-causing pathogenCandidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (Boina & Bloomquist, 2015). After psyllids have been established in a region the control of the disease is reduced to the management of their population. High reproduction rates of the insect make the task extremely difficult.

The approaches to the management of the condition can be divided into two categories: chemical control of ACP population and chemical control of HLB transmission (Feely, 2016). Chemical control of ACP is performed through the foliar, soil, and trunk application of insecticides (Feely, 2016). The chemical agents affect the psyllids nervous system, which causes a rapid death. Due to a high frequency of the insects flushing patterns, farmers use a high volume of insecticides that drench the soil underneath orange trees. Soil application further exacerbates the issue of chemical pollution. Chemical control of HLB is conducted with the help of trunk-injected antibiotics (Boina & Bloomquist, 2015). This method of control presupposes frequent intervention, which increases the change of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus developing resistance to antibiotics (Boina & Bloomquist, 2015).

Unfortunately, the agricultural use of insecticides is associated with numerous ecological consequences. It has to do with the fact that insecticides are highly biologically active substances that can threaten the ecological integrity of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems (Stehle & Schulz, 2015, p. 5750). The expansion of agricultural capacities in the Western world has led to the increase in insecticide use by 750 percent in the period from 1955 to 2000 (Stehle & Schulz, 2015). Despite stringent environmental regulations, insecticides inevitably enter non-target areas.

The exposure of surface waters to dangerous chemical agents is one of the most problematic consequences of the pesticide use. A study conducted by Stehle and Schulz (2015) shows that in more than 50 percent of cases the amount of pesticides in surface waters exceeds threshold levels. Another study shows that the normal ecosystem functioning and resilience are threatened by the pesticide use because it affects microbes and invertebrates that function as decomposers and pollinators (Chagnon et al., 2015). In case of waterbodies, the use of chemical agents damages fish populations who are both consumers and predators. It follows that Florida orange harvest crisis is associated with an ethical dilemma of whether pesticides can be used to save harvests, while simultaneously indiscriminately distinguishing many creatures and endangering the integrity of entire ecosystems.

Management of HLB
Market Utilitarianism
Market utilitarianism favors market solutions to ecological problems (Kernohan, 2012).
Under market utilitarianism, every individual should be left to their own devices.
Market solutions hinge on the protection of private property rights.
OToole and Baxter argue that since every individual should be left to their own devices, environmental problems must be resolved with the help of market solutions (as cited in Desjardins, 2013). It follows that an answer to the ethical dilemma is a proper protection of private property rights, which will stop farmers from polluting the environment.

Market Utilitarianism
Critique of Market Utilitarianism
Basic premises of market utilitarianism are challenged by environmentalists (Desjardins & McCall, 2014).
The opponents of market solutions for environmental problems claim that they are based on unrealistic assumptions about the nature of the world.
In the real world, information is much more diffused than in abstract mathematical models.
Transaction costs are often associated with externalities (Desjardins & McCall, 2014).
Market utilitarianism has always been criticized for its overreliance on mathematical abstractions that do not take into consideration environmental externalities. Diffusion of information is a barrier to to the problem of insecticide pollution.

Critique of Market Utilitarianism
Shallow Ecology
Shallow ecology presupposes that humans are the only species of value (Fryer, 2014).
The worldview is inherently anthropocentric.
The protection of the environment is a means to improving the well-being of humans.
Shallow ecology is a limited outlook on the environment that regards nature as a means to human ends (Fryer, 2014). When viewed from the perspective of shallow ecology, Florida orange harvest crisis has to be addressed in order to farther interests of people who consume fruits. Furthermore, the damages caused by the insecticide pollution might make it difficult to obtain resources in the future. It follows that shallow ecology and market utilitarianism are closely aligned concepts.

Shallow Ecology
Deep Ecology
Unlike shallow ecology, deep ecology is a worldview that is concentrated on causes of environmenal issues such as pollution (Desjardins, 2013).
Deep environmental perspectives are not human-centered. The proponents of the philosophical view argue that nature has intrinsic value; therefore, it is worth protecting for its own sake (Desjardins, 2013).
In the framework of deep ecology, the use of insecticides is immoral because it harms many species.
Anthropocentrism is an underlying cause of all ecological problems (Desjardins, 2013).
Deep Ecology
Key Principles of Deep Ecology
All nonhuman life-forms are intrinsically valuable.
It is wrong to measure the value of against interests of humans (Desjardins, 2013).
Humans cannot interfere with ecosystems except for satisfaction of their vital needs.
To resolve the ethical conundrum under discussion, a radical approach is needed. Namely, instead of trying to develop less harmful insecticides for controlling ACP populations, it is necessary to change human perception of the environment. People have to realize that in an attempt to increase the production of orange crops they eradicate organisms whose lives are intrinsically valuable.

Key Principles of Deep Ecology
Biocentric Ethics
Biocentric ethics are environmental ethics that are characterized by reverence for all life forms (Kernohan, 2012).
The biocentric outlook presupposes four basic tenets:
Humans are members of earths community of life (Desjardins, 2013, p. 141);
All living organisms are interdependent;
All life forms pursue their own ends in accordance with the reality of their means;
Humans are in no way shape or form superior to other living beings.
Biocentric Ethics
Practical Implications of Biocentric Ethics
With respect to the ethical dilemma, biocentric ethics have the following practical implications:

With respect to the ethical dilemma, biocentric ethics have the following practical implications:
The rule of nonmaleficence calls for the discontinuation of harmful farming practices because they threaten living organisms.
The duty of noninterference demands Floridas farmers to refrain from misbalancing local ecosystems.
The rule or restitutive justice necessitates active steps towards the restoration of water resources harmed by chemical pollutants.
Strict adherence to biocentric principles will help to restore Floridas ecosystems damaged by actions of farmers seeking excessive profits.