Mandatory Sentencing and Drug Laws Annotated Bibliography
The author of this article takes into consideration the results of previous investigations about mandatory guidelines and their impact on prisoners. The main purpose of the article is to define how the guidelines define the quality of prisoners life and can mitigate population in prisons. Using the thoughtful evaluation of the prison population between 1975 and 1998, the writer proves that American prisoners do not feel some considerable changes in their conditions. This is why this article may become solid evidence that mandatory sentencing cannot perform some crucial role in drug laws and influence imprisoning conditions.
The article shows that incarceration rates are considerably increased after are offered (Nicholson-Crotty, 2004), and it seems to be rational to re-evaluate the guidelines identify to change the situation and get the required portion of control in the sphere of drug law. and statistics, the article becomes a solid source of information that helps to investigate the idea of mandatory sentencing among Americans.
Sorenson, J. & Stemen, D. (2002). The effect of state sentencing policies on incarceration rates. Crime & Delinquency, 48(3), 456-475.
The chosen article is considered to be a reliable source of information about the connection between and the rates of incarceration and prison admission (Sorensen & Stemen, 2002). The period of the late 1990s is taken into account; the authors not only describe the effects of mandatory sentencing but also analyze the outcomes of such policies observed among the prisoners.
The success of this article is predetermined by the possibility to prove that state policymakers have to pay more attention to such factors as citizen ideology and to influence the behavior of prisoners and develop a strategy to evaluate the results of their work. It is not enough to think about possible changes in policies, but it is more important to define the elements which may change the development of the events and define the quality of life among the prisoners in different states of one country.