Probing Crime based on Conduct Report
Analysis of historic activities in a case produces substantial evidence for persecution. Courts have depended on the evidence presented to indict based on material from crime scenes and pass sentences on cases. This has however been outwitted by the lawbreakers or destruction and loss of evidence which has led to improper persecution of trials.
In the investigation of a criminal case, the crime reports can be taken on for scrutiny. These statements are derived from the scene or the area of alleged illegal activity. The perpetrator who is alleged to have committed the act is entitled to a fair trial. To grant this right, a comprehensive probe has to be carried out to determine the accusation based on evidence. The summary of the analyzed data from the investigation is presented in a court of law for legal action.
The on evidence and the examiner has to prove the case beyond the reason of doubt. To scrutinize an illegal case, aspects of behavior structure are resolved before, at the period of, and beyond the unlawful act. These findings are merged with and objective proof. This combination is used to contrast with the traits of familiar behavior styles and psychological defects to build up a of the wrongdoer. (Winerman, 2004)
The work of a prosecutor depends on the work done by the investigator. The nature of crime is that it is done in an undercover technique. This makes the unfolding of the illegal act with the offender challenging to the inspector. Investigators have of unearthing evidence such as forensic and . (Meyer, 2000)
The research seeks to find out which is the most appropriate method of exploring crime and the architects behind it. Investigators have used eye witness and their accounts in preparing cases for persecution. The lawbreakers have got smarter and developed ways of eluding the eye of the public by the use of stands such as disguises or masks. (Winerman, 2004)
The study will determine why cases of crime have had difficulties in the preparations. The wrongdoers have mastered their art of crime and they leave scenes with little evidence. This has resulted in crippling of law enforcement as justice is not normally served. Crime scenes have been destroyed or altered giving the investigators a difficult time. Some destructions could be intentional and some accidental. (Meyer, 2000)
The research paper scrutinizes if there are any advancements in crime probing technology. In order to prove cases as proposed, the prosecutor is required by law to convince the court using appropriate evidence. Law enforcers need to develop technologies that will aid them in getting these proofs. The equipment should be updated frequently as the criminals continue to improve on their activities which will escape undetected. (Winerman, 2004)