Public Policing v. Private Security Research
For this reason, they cannot bear the blame for not responding to an incident of a crime if the affected entities have not subscribed to their services. Rather, they are accountable to their employer and/or anyone who pays them for their services.
This situation limits their role in society as a whole to specific cases. Private security guards are not allowed to make arrests. Their function mainly revolves around deterring criminal activities through their presence. Therefore, they are required to report cases that need arrests to the police department. On their part, public police officers have the authority to arrest criminals and/or book them for further questioning and imminent prosecution where necessary.
However, it is crucial to note that private security and public policing share similar goals. Private and have a duty of offering protection to certain entities. While private security officers focus their efforts on specific entities that have subscribed to their services, public officers also offer the same kind of protection, although on a wider scale where they incorporate more persons and entities, irrespective of whether they have subscribed to them or not. In addition, they require one to undergo some form of training before he or she is allowed to offer the services (ASIS International, 2014). Law enforcement officers are trained in police academies while their training mainly from the various private security firms that are available in the market.
Variation of Leadership between Private Security and Public Policing Roles
Leadership in the private security sector and public policing varies significantly. In the private sector, people who are tasked with leading a security firms activities are selected through various processes that are predetermined by the relevant firms. Such processes are set as standard procedures in their recruitment policies. They may or may not be experts in security affairs. It is upon the management of the boards of the various firms to choose the kind of formula to use in determining the leadership of the respective firms. The management departments of the respective private security companies determine the roles and positions of their officers.
These staff people are expected to maintain their functions within the requirements of their respective company policies. Any issues that fall outside these specific requirements are considered not being part of their job description.
On the other hand, leadership in the from what is seen in the private sector. Leaders who run the activities of the public police departments draw their powers from the provisions of laws that determine the extent of their operations. The law requires that such persons should have the necessary qualification in areas that relate to criminology. Staff members who are bestowed with the duty of selecting new officers in this sector demand a certain degree of experience from the recruits in terms of , preferably from the public sector. Their roles are broad since they cover a wide range of aspects and entities.
