World Health Relates to EBP in the Joanna Briggs Institute
The models compared and contrasted are the and (JBI) Model. Notably, the ACE Star Model presents a framework for understanding the correlation between numerous stages of knowledge transformation. In this model, knowledge transformation refers to the conversion of research findings from primary research results, through a series of stages and forms, to impact on health outcomes by the way of evidence-based care (Keele, 2010, p. 79). Thus, the model provides an essential framework for analytically putting evidence-based processes into action. This model has five stages, which include knowledge discovery, evidence summary, translation, implementation, and evaluation (Houser & Oman, 2010).
On the other hand, the JBI model is based on the belief that different types of evidence are useful in providing solutions to certain issues (Houser & Oman, 2010). Besides, the JBI model assumes that no single type of evidence is superior in providing solutions to numerous medical solutions. Thus, the quality of evidence varies from one application to another. Notably, the solutions to issues relating to the effectiveness of interventions emanate from meta-analyses or systematic views of well-conducted randomized controlled trials (Hopp & Rittenmeyer, 2012). JBI model has four primary evidence interests, which include evidence of feasibility, evidence of meaningfulness, evidence of appropriateness, and evidence of effectiveness.
Which Model would you Recommend, and Why?
I would recommend the use of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) model. Notably, at each stage of the JBI model, there are inherent methods that make the concept operational. For instance, at synthesis stage, the model has methods, training, and software to support the production of systematic reviews as well as an online library to distribute such analytical evaluations (Hopp & Rittenmeyer, 2012). Again, JBI promotes the dissemination of clinical practice guidelines to nurses in other parts of the world (White & Dudley-Brown, 2011). Further, JBI has methods and tools in each section or slice of the pie for enhancing the probability that each part of evidence will infiltrate into .
Which EBP would you Recommend for your Work Setting, Why?
In the medical surgical geriatric floor situation, I would recommend the use of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) model. Mainly, this work setting deals with cardiac patients, respiratory patients, and hospice patients; therefore, the JBI model suits this situation because it advocates for the use of different types of evidence to provide solutions to various issues (Hopp & Rittenmeyer, 2012). Particularly, the type of evidence required for cardiac patients is significantly different regarding use and appropriateness of the ones needed for respiratory and hospice patients. Besides, the model advocates for a patients preference based on a factor such as financial, cultural, and physical feasibility.
How World Health Relates to EBP in the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Model
The JBI model may be used to guide the evidence implementation at the local level and at the same time provide a tool that permits nurses or physicians to think globally, and act locally (Hopp & Rittenmeyer, 2012). Notably, global health is an inspiration for and the end goal of evidence-based practice in the JBI model. Besides, JBI model is based on the assumption that no single form of evidence is superior in addressing all medical problems (Keele, 2010). As such, the model advocates for the inclusion and sharing of diverse types of evidence from numerous sources such as expert opinions, empirical research, and clinical experiences across the globe.
